data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8448f/8448f46090a02e69594b68457f910a233a9c730a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0df52/0df5257da56912b7f87a01c97501c2226161b5bc" alt=""
Yes, top-tier professional athletes have become better, faster, and stronger than their counterparts from yesteryear, and there are a lot of reasons for that. But there is no way you can tell me that this change in the body of a man in his forties is solely the result of good nutrition and exercise. There's been some other kinds of science helping him out, too.
So there are two questions -- first, does race have anything to do with the baseball-loving public's distaste for the prospect of Bonds getting one of the most prestigious and prominent records in the rich history of the sport? I think not. I'm not saying that America is colorblind. I'm saying that sports fans -- even ones who may have some obnoxious racial attitudes in other parts of their lives -- are more than willing to accept and admire black athletes. Non-sports fans don't care about Bonds one way or the other, but sports fans as a group tend to care about performance and achievement.
No, I think people don't like the idea of Bonds having that record not because Bonds is black, but because Bonds is a jerk. You don't have to be white to be an asshole. Besides, the current record-holder, Hank Aaron, is also black. And Bonds' godfather; the two men are personally very close, which most sports fans think is pretty cool even if they aren't particularly big Bonds fans themselves.
Second, do we care if Bonds is using human growth hormone, steroids, or various kinds of supplements that are not part of a "normal" diet and exercise regimen? These are not "normal" people who are just playing baseball for fun. The market rewards athletes who push themselves as hard as possible, and do whatever is within their power to excel. We sports fans love it when we see records being broken and demonstrations of feats of remarkable strength, agility, speed, and physical abilities. So why shouldn't Bonds use (legal) drugs and other products to make himself better? Didn't athletes of the bygone years of "fair play" engage in unusual training and dietary regimens, too? Granted, their ideas of what to eat and how to conduct their lives to be better at their craft were different than ours today (lots of red meat, sitz baths, and things like that) but we don't put asterisks next to their names anymore.
Ultimately, it doesn't make much difference in the world if Bonds is a steroid user, HGH user, or if he's simply an honest baseball player with an image problem. He'll very likely break the home run record this year, and good for him. He is what the sports market has demanded that he be, and he should reap the rewards that go with it. If the achievement seems corrupted (and it does) that is not just Bonds' fault. It is also the fault of the governing authorities of the sport who mollycoddle and turn a blind eye to what they call "cheating" and it is also the fault of the fans and consumers of the sport who demonstrate, time and again, that "cheating" isn't nearly as important as winning. That is a problem that goes well beyond Barry Bonds.
And the fact that Bonds is black is really a minute issue compared with the fact that society rewards cheaters.
3 comments:
The problem, according to some, is race.
putting the , according to some, doesn't take you off the hook for not mentioning that the record is held by
Henry Aaron (comma) who is black !!!
Sorry I should have added that you needed to put this in the first paragraph.
"Besides, the current record-holder, Hank Aaron, is also black."
I don't think it's so important to the point of my post that the current record-holder is black. Baseball fans could be unhappy about that, too, if they are really hard-core racists. So I think noting that Aaron is black is appropriate for a down-paragraph mention, at least for what I was trying to say -- race isn't very important here.
Post a Comment