data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/24eac/24eac0b31282cd0044936b4f298d7e1e62744cad" alt=""
I’m sorry; Obama may well be innocent of corruption (with respect to Rezko or anyone else), but if this were happening to a past compatriot of a Republican – or maybe even to a past compatriot of Hillary Clinton – we’d be hearing all about the connection to the candidate in explicit terms. Obama doesn’t get a pass on this because he’s likeable. Or at least, he shouldn’t. Doesn't seem fair.
Fact is, Obama is as tainted by corruption as anyone – he did have all of his early political career in Chicago. That doesn’t mean he’s corrupt himself. It means he was near people who are. That is what should be explored, as aggressively as it would be for any other candidate.
2 comments:
Golden Boy
You don't want the Stanley Mosk "types" getting a hold of this headline. You might loss your Starbuck privileges(-:
Oh noes! No more four-dollar lattes for me!
It's a price I'd be willing to pay.
Post a Comment