Somehow I think you can reassure yourself that your not-exactly-liberalism does not indicate that you are stupider than the people of startlingly average intelligence studied here.
Anyhow, I'll give you a pass for being not-exactly-liberal if you'll give me a pass for my vague, ambivalent syncretism.
Thoughtful, insightful, or informative comments are always welcome. Advertising will be deleted permanently. TL reserves the right to delete comments in his sole discretion (but rarely does so other than for advertising).
All dummies
ReplyDeletehttp://tinyurl.com/yb2c9oz
No, none of them were. Nor were they what you'd call "conservatives," advocating a radical change in the existing form of government and all.
ReplyDeleteSomehow I think you can reassure yourself that your not-exactly-liberalism does not indicate that you are stupider than the people of startlingly average intelligence studied here.
ReplyDeleteAnyhow, I'll give you a pass for being not-exactly-liberal if you'll give me a pass for my vague, ambivalent syncretism.
Who said anything about being a conservative?
ReplyDeletepeople who identified as liberal and atheist had higher IQs.
They were signing a document stating
"...that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights..."
Maybe they were confused then.
Ah. Well, being misunderstood is a risk you run when you value brevity over clarity, or precision.
ReplyDeleteMy thoughts on assigning religiosity to the Founders are already on record.
Why use 2 words when you can use 15!
ReplyDelete